Cursus iaculis etiam in
Your clothes aren’t just a fashion choice—they’re a political act. Whether you’re dressed for a tech conference in San Francisco, a weekend at Soho House, or a flight to Paris via Air France, how you show up is inseparable from how you’re perceived ideologically.
A pair of Nike sneakers or a Chanel blazer might say more about your values than your Twitter bio. In today’s hyper-visible world, your outfit can speak louder than your words.
When Fashion Becomes Foreign Policy
A recent trip through Europe highlighted this more than ever. While standing at Zürich airport’s Swiss customs, the author found himself apologizing—for being American. Not because of personal shame, but due to the global perception shaped by U.S. politics and media, including outlets like Fox News and CNN.
In that moment, his well-tailored coat from COS and modest humor became tools of diplomacy. Fashion, suddenly, became more than personal expression—it was international soft power.
Americans abroad, especially those dressing with intention—think J.Crew or Theory—often represent more than themselves. They’re perceived as walking reflections of Silicon Valley’s dominance or Hollywood’s cultural exports like Netflix or HBO Max.
Brands in the Crossfire
Politics and fashion collided dramatically during the Trump presidency. Nordstrom dropped Ivanka Trump’s fashion line, citing poor sales. The backlash was swift—Donald Trump fired off tweets calling the move “unfair.” Consumers on both sides took sides, turning their shopping carts into voting booths.
Kevin Plank, then CEO of Under Armour, praised Trump’s business acumen. The result? Social media blowback and boycotts. Eventually, he walked back his remarks. Similarly, L.L. Bean—long seen as apolitical like Patagonia—was thrust into controversy when a family member voiced support for Trump.
In today’s environment, even brands like H&M or Balenciaga can find themselves in political storms for statements they didn’t even make. Your shopping habits? They’re political now too.
The Presidential Wardrobe
President Trump’s personal style became a global conversation. His infamously long ties—often held together by Scotch tape—were lampooned across late-night TV and dissected in The New York Times. The symbolism was too rich to ignore: power without polish, brand without mastery.
Contrast that with Melania Trump, whose wardrobe was a masterclass in coded messaging. From her Ralph Lauren powder blue suit in 2017—an homage to Jackie Kennedy—to her controversial “I Really Don’t Care, Do U?” jacket, every piece was scrutinized like a political speech.
At the 2025 inauguration, Melania’s navy silk coat and wide-brimmed Eric Javits hat created an aura of detachment and mystery, signaling subtle power. She became less a First Lady and more a Netflix antagonist.
Fashion’s Historical Power
This dynamic is nothing new. Queen Elizabeth II wore bright colors to be seen from afar—a visual strategy worthy of Amazon’s homepage logic. Jackie Kennedy’s pillbox hats became icons of American sophistication, much like Michelle Obama’s affinity for emerging designers like Jason Wu.
In contrast, Marie Antoinette’s opulent gowns became symbols of tone-deaf royalty. Her “Let them eat cake” moment wasn’t a quote—it was her closet.
In modern times, Kamala Harris wore a suffragette white pantsuit during her 2020 victory speech, blending feminism and legacy in a single silhouette. Hillary Clinton did the same throughout her career, often using color as political language.
Gaming & Fashion? It’s Happening
Even in the world of gaming, style is signaling. In Fortnite, avatar skins are status symbols. In EA Sports’ FIFA, brands like Adidas and Puma dominate. In Roblox and Minecraft, young players build identities as carefully as influencers on TikTok.
This crossover isn’t accidental. Louis Vuitton collaborated with League of Legends. Gucci partnered with The Sims. Fashion is merging with platforms that once ignored couture altogether.
Charting Fashion’s Political Impact
Source: Visual Analytics based on Statista trend insights and consumer surveys from Deloitte (2023)
Identity Politics and the Fashion Paradox
The rise of identity politics—where individual traits like race, gender, and sexuality become central to public life—has mirrored fashion’s own shift. No longer is fashion about fitting in. Now, it’s about standing out.
But can fashion really represent individuality?
Postmodern theorists like Jean-François Lyotard argue that as political “Master Narratives” like Marxism or conservatism collapsed, people replaced collective movements with fragmented identities. Everyone became their own brand. This wasn’t just ideological—it became commercial.
Fashion brands now sell morality as merchandise. Dior’s “We Should All Be Feminists” shirts, Balenciaga’s climate change commentary, and even Nike’s Colin Kaepernick campaign—all walk the tightrope between message and marketing.
Fashion’s New Frontier: Morality as a Product
Luxury brands, from Hermès to Versace, have embraced the language of sustainability and diversity. But fast fashion giants like Shein and Zara, despite marketing “green” capsules, still rely on mass overproduction and global shipping—ironically worsening the climate issues they claim to care about.
Capitalism, as Slavoj Žižek notes, now sells both the crisis and the solution. Fashion, in this framework, isn’t solving injustice—it’s monetizing the response.
Is Fashion Truly Self-Expression?
Historically, fashion didn’t express identity—it enforced it. In 19th-century Europe, women’s wardrobes signaled social class and respectability, not creativity. Men’s suits became simpler, reducing individuality in favor of uniformity. It wasn’t about who you were, but where you belonged.
Even in pop culture, this holds true. In “American Psycho,” Patrick Bateman’s obsession with labels—Armani, Valentino, Rolex—signals power, not personality. Dynasty and Mad Men echoed the same.
Today’s “mix-and-match” aesthetic is postmodern rebellion against the total look. But even that chaos is curated—usually by stylists or influencers, not the wearers themselves.
A World Obsessed with Being Seen
In the age of Instagram, Pinterest, and Meta, every outfit becomes content. Your Zara blazer or Prada tote could be shared, judged, liked, and monetized. The pressure to be visible—and virtuous—has never been higher.
Streaming platforms like Hulu and Prime Video now dictate style trends through costume design. Think: Succession’s “quiet luxury,” Euphoria’s Gen-Z glitter chaos, or Emily in Paris’ maximalist Euro-kitsch.
Even Premier League footballers, like those from Manchester United or Arsenal, are regularly critiqued more for their tunnel outfits than their gameplay.
Conclusion
Fashion isn’t just fabric—it’s a language. And today, it’s speaking louder than ever.
From the White House to the runway, from TikTok to Wall Street, what you wear can shape how you’re seen. Whether you’re shopping at ASOS or Net-a-Porter, your choices reflect not just taste—but values, politics, and privilege.
So next time you get dressed, ask yourself: are you just picking an outfit, or telling the world a story?
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Readers are encouraged to do thorough research before making any investment decisions.
